Current:Home > MyArizona Republicans challenge Biden’s designation of a national monument near the Grand Canyon -MacroWatch
Arizona Republicans challenge Biden’s designation of a national monument near the Grand Canyon
View
Date:2025-04-25 18:06:46
The Arizona Legislature’s top two Republicans have challenged Democratic President Joe Biden’s creation of a new national monument last summer just outside Grand Canyon National Park, alleging he exceeded his legal authority in making that designation under a century-old law that lets presidents protect sites considered historically or culturally important. In a lawsuit filed Monday against Biden, Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen and House Speaker Ben Toma alleged Biden’s decision to designate the new monument under the 1906 Antiquities Act wasn’t limited to preserving objects of historic or scientific value and isn’t confined to the “the smallest area compatible with the proper care and management of the objects to be protected.”
The monument designation will help preserve 1,562 square miles (4,046 square kilometers) just to the north and south of Grand Canyon National Park. The monument, called Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni, turned a decadeslong vision for Native American tribes and environmentalists into a reality. Republican lawmakers and the uranium mining industry that operates in the area had opposed the designation, touting the economic benefits for the region while arguing that the mining efforts are a matter of national security.
“Biden’s maneuver is incredibly disingenuous, as it has nothing to do with protecting actual artifacts,” Petersen said in a statement. “Instead, it aims to halt all mining, ranching, and other local uses of federal lands that are critical to our energy independence from adversary foreign nations, our food supply and the strength of our economy.”
The White House and the U.S. Department of the Interior declined to comment on the lawsuit.
Mohave County and the northern Arizona communities of Colorado City and Fredonia also sued the Biden administration as part of the challenge.
The lawsuit says Mohave County and Colorado City will see a loss of tax revenue due to reduced mining activity and that the land-use restrictions that come from a monument designation will reduce the value of surrounding land, including State Trust Land, which produces incomes that benefits Arizona’s public schools and other beneficiaries.
The Interior Department, reacting to concerns over the risk of contaminating water, enacted a 20-year moratorium on the filing of new mining claims around the national park in 2012. No uranium mines are operating in Arizona, although the Pinyon Plain Mine, just south of Grand Canyon National Park, has been under development for years. Other claims are grandfathered in. The federal government has said nearly a dozen mines within the area that have been withdrawn from new mining claims could still potentially open. Just days after Biden made the designation in northern Arizona, a federal judge in Utah dismissed a lawsuit challenging the president’s restoration of two sprawling national monuments in the state that had been downsized by then-President Donald Trump.
The judge said Biden acted within his authority when he issued proclamations restoring Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments in 2021. Both monuments are on land sacred to many Native Americans.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Fire on Hawaii's Maui island forces people to jump into water to flee flames
- Boot up these early Labor Day laptop deals on Apple, Samsung, Acer and more
- Treat Yourself to $600 Worth of Self-Care Products for $75: Elemis, Augustinus Bader, Slip, Nest & More
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Getting clear prices for hospital care could get easier under a proposed rule
- Treat Yourself to $600 Worth of Self-Care Products for $75: Elemis, Augustinus Bader, Slip, Nest & More
- New car prices are cooling, but experts say you still might want to wait to buy
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Summer School 5: Tech and the innovator's dilemma
Ranking
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Inside Russia's attempts to hack Ukrainian military operations
- 2 robotaxi services seeking to bypass safety concerns and expand in San Francisco face pivotal vote
- A poet pieces together an uncertain past in 'Memoir of a Kidnapping'
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- Below Deck Down Under's Captain Jason Speaks Out on Sexual Misconduct After 2 Shocking Firings
- Officials suspect Rachel Morin died in 'violent homicide' after she went missing on Maryland trail
- Man killed during FBI raid in Utah posted threats online against Biden, sources say
Recommendation
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
LGBTQ+ veterans file civil rights suit against Pentagon over discriminatory discharges
Russia hits Ukraine with deadly hypersonic missile strike as Kyiv claims local women spying for Moscow
Federal trial to decide whether ex-chief of staff lied to protect his boss, Illinois House speaker
Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
Going camping or hiking this summer? Consider bringing along these safety products
Katy Perry, Orlando Bloom head to trial after man claims he sold them his home while medicated
Stop Waiting In Lines and Overpaying for Coffee: Get 56% Off a Cook’s Essentials Espresso Maker