Current:Home > ContactOfficial who posted ‘ballot selfie’ in Wisconsin has felony charge dismissed -MacroWatch
Official who posted ‘ballot selfie’ in Wisconsin has felony charge dismissed
View
Date:2025-04-16 13:46:47
PORT WASHINGTON, Wis. (AP) — A local official who posted a photo of his marked ballot on Facebook during the April 2022 election had felony charges against him dropped Monday.
Paul Buzzell, 52, of Mequon had faced maximum penalties of 3 1/2 years behind bars and $10,000 in fines. Buzzell, a member of the Mequon-Thiensville School Board, would have also been barred from holding elected office if convicted.
Ozaukee County Judge Paul Malloy dismissed the charges against Buzzell in a hearing Monday, saying a state law prohibiting voters from showing their marked ballots to anyone else is in violation of the constitutional right to freedom of speech, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.
“This case was about more than just a Facebook post; it was about protecting the fundamental right to freedom of expression,” Michael Chernin, Buzzell’s attorney, said in a statement to the newspaper.
Ozaukee County District Attorney Adam Gerol, who brought the charges against Buzzell, promised to continue pursuing the case by asking Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul to review the judge’s decision and decide whether to file an appeal.
Kaul did not respond to a request for comment from the Journal Sentinel on Monday.
There has been movement in other states in favor of allowing the so-called ballot selfies.
In New Hampshire, a federal judge held that a state law barring an individual’s right to publish their ballot violated the First Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal. And in Michigan, Wisconsin’s neighbor, legislators changed state law in 2019 to make the practice legal.
The Wisconsin Senate passed a bill in 2020 to legalize ballot selfies, but the proposal died in the state Assembly.
Candidates for office in Wisconsin have sporadically posted photos of their completed ballots online over the years, in apparent violation of the law, but no charges were brought.
veryGood! (763)
Related
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Soccer legend Megan Rapinoe announces she will retire after 2023 season
- Pregnant Stassi Schroeder Wants to Try Ozempic After Giving Birth
- Anthropologie Quietly Added Thousands of New Items to Their Sale Section: Get a $110 Skirt for $20 & More
- Trump's 'stop
- Amazon launched a driver tipping promotion on the same day it got sued over tip fraud
- 'Can I go back to my regular job?' Sports anchor goes viral for blizzard coverage
- Residents Want a Stake in Wisconsin’s Clean Energy Transition
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- An Indiana Church Fights for Solar Net-Metering to Save Low-Income Seniors Money
Ranking
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- What Would It Take to Turn Ohio’s Farms Carbon-Neutral?
- Q&A: A Pioneer of Environmental Justice Explains Why He Sees Reason for Optimism
- Across America, Five Communities in Search of Environmental Justice
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- In bad news for true loves, inflation is hitting the 12 Days of Christmas
- Who created chicken tikka masala? The death of a curry king is reviving a debate
- In big win for Tesla, more car companies plan to use its supercharging network
Recommendation
Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
Following Berkeley’s Natural Gas Ban, More California Cities Look to All-Electric Future
Big entertainment bets: World Cup & Avatar
Get a $64 Lululemon Tank for $19, $64 Shorts for $29, $119 Pants for $59 and More Mind-Blowing Finds
Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
Warmer Temperatures May Offer California Farmers a Rare Silver Lining: Fewer Frosts
Detlev Helmig Was Frugal With Tax Dollars. Then CU Fired Him for Misusing Funds.
Why the proposed TikTok ban is more about politics than privacy, according to experts