Current:Home > MarketsWhat was Trump convicted of? Details on the 34 counts and his guilty verdict -MacroWatch
What was Trump convicted of? Details on the 34 counts and his guilty verdict
View
Date:2025-04-14 23:51:02
Former President Donald Trump's conviction in New York stemmed from a $130,000 "hush money" payment his attorney Michael Cohen made to adult film star Stormy Daniels in the days before the 2016 election. Prosecutors said the deal was meant to keep voters in the dark about Daniels' allegation that she had sex with Trump years earlier, which he denies.
But the actual charges that Trump faced were far less salacious, and dealt with the comparatively mundane paperwork that was generated when he reimbursed Cohen for the payment.
Here's what to know about the charges Trump faced:
What was Trump convicted of?
Trump was charged with 34 counts of falsification of business records in the first degree, which is a felony in New York. He pleaded not guilty when he was arraigned last year.
In 2017, Cohen and Allen Weisselberg, an executive at the Trump Organization, reached an agreement about how Cohen would be repaid for the $130,000 that he sent to Daniels in exchange for her silence. Weisselberg detailed the calculations in handwritten notes that were shown to the jury at trial.
Cohen would receive $130,000 for the Daniels payment, plus $50,000 intended for a technology company that did unrelated work for Trump. That amount was doubled to account for taxes that Cohen would have to pay on the income. Weisselberg then tacked on an extra $60,000 as a bonus for Cohen, who was upset that his regular year-end award had been cut. The total worked out to $420,000.
Cohen would be paid in a series of monthly payments of $35,000 over the course of 2017. The first check was for $70,000, covering two months. Cohen sent an invoice to the Trump Organization for each check, portraying the payment as his "retainer." Every time he was paid, a bookkeeper generated a record for the company's files, known as a voucher, with the description "legal expense." The first three payments were made from Trump's trust, while the remaining nine came from his personal account.
Each of the 34 charges against Trump corresponded to a check, invoice and voucher generated to reimburse Cohen. The prosecution laid out the charges in a chart that jurors saw several times during the trial:
Prosecutors said Trump knew the payments were to reimburse Cohen for the Daniels payment, not for his legal expenses.
The jury voted to convict on all 34 counts. As Trump looked on, the court's clerk asked the foreperson of the jury for the verdict.
"How say you to the first count of the indictment, charging Donald J. Trump with the crime of falsifying business records in the first degree, guilty or not guilty?" the clerk asked.
"Guilty," the foreperson responded, repeating the answer 33 more times.
Why were the charges a felony?
Under New York law, falsification of business records is a crime when the records are altered with an intent to defraud. To be charged as a felony, prosecutors must also show that the offender intended to "commit another crime" or "aid or conceal" another crime when falsifying records.
In Trump's case, prosecutors said that other crime was a violation of a New York election law that makes it illegal for "any two or more persons" to "conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means," as Justice Juan Merchan explained in his instructions to the jury.
What exactly those "unlawful means" were in this case was up to the jury to decide. Prosecutors put forth three areas that they could consider: a violation of federal campaign finance laws, falsification of other business records or a violation of tax laws.
Jurors did not need to agree on what the underlying "unlawful means" were. But they did have to unanimously conclude that Trump caused the business records to be falsified, and that he "did so with intent to defraud that included an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof."
What was Trump's defense?
Trump's lawyers argued that the payments to Cohen were for his work as Trump's attorney, not reimbursements for the Daniels payment.
The defense argued that the descriptions on the invoices and records were accurate — Cohen held the title "personal attorney to the president" once Trump took office, and was being paid for his legal services under an unwritten retainer agreement. Therefore, their argument went, no business records were falsified.
They also focused much of their firepower on portraying Cohen as a liar, with the goal of discrediting his testimony. Cohen was the only witness who testified that Trump knew about the true purpose of the reimbursements, a crucial pillar of prosecutors' effort to show Trump's intent.
Ultimately, the jurors rejected the defense's arguments and sided with prosecutors in finding Trump guilty.
When will Trump be sentenced?
Shortly after the verdict was handed down, Merchan, the judge, set Trump's sentencing date for July 11, just days before the start of the Republican National Convention.
Under New York law, each count of falsifying business records in the first degree carries a maximum sentence of four years in prison and a $5,000 fine. But Merchan has broad discretion when it comes to imposing a sentence. Most legal observers expect him to punish Trump with little or no time behind bars, based on factors like Trump's status as a first-time offender and his age. Merchan could instead rely on options like probation, home confinement or solely a fine.
Trump has vowed to appeal the verdict, and any sentence could be delayed until that process plays out.
Stefan BecketStefan Becket is a managing editor of politics for CBSNews.com. Stefan has covered national politics for more than a decade and helps oversee a team covering the White House, Congress, the Supreme Court, immigration and federal law enforcement.
TwitterveryGood! (17)
Related
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- Is the economy headed for recession or a soft landing?
- Lisa Marie Presley died of small bowel obstruction, medical examiner says
- Temple University cuts tuition and health benefits for striking graduate students
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- Incursions Into Indigenous Lands Not Only Threaten Tribal Food Systems, But the Planet’s Well-Being
- An Offshore Wind Farm on Lake Erie Moves Closer to Reality, but Will It Ever Be Built?
- Meet the judge deciding the $1.6 billion defamation case against Fox News
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Is Project Texas enough to save TikTok?
Ranking
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Want To Get Ready in 3 Minutes? Beauty Gurus Love This $5 Makeup Stick for Cheeks, Eyes, and Lips
- Arby's+? More restaurants try subscription programs to keep eaters coming back
- No ideological splits, only worried justices as High Court hears Google case
- Average rate on 30
- The social cost of carbon: a powerful tool and ethics nightmare
- For the Second Time in Four Years, the Ninth Circuit Has Ordered the EPA to Set New Lead Paint and Dust Standards
- Microsoft vs. Google: Whose AI is better?
Recommendation
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
More than 300,000 bottles of Starbucks bottled Frappuccinos have been recalled
Arby's+? More restaurants try subscription programs to keep eaters coming back
Are you caught in the millennial vs. boomer housing competition? Tell us about it
Travis Hunter, the 2
Without ‘Transformative Adaptation’ Climate Change May Threaten the Survival of Millions of Small Scale Farmers
Does Another Plastics Plant in Louisiana’s ‘Cancer Alley’ Make Sense? A New Report Says No
With a Warming Climate, Coastal Fog Around the World Is Declining